Is there a canonical reason that the protagonist of the Mandalorian is still unnamed?

Is there a canonical reason that the protagonist of the Mandalorian is still unnamed? - Beige Sofa Chair Near A Table

To my knowledge those wearing Mandalorian armor have always had a proper name (e.g., Boba Fett, Jango Fett), as well as other works I'm not familar with, referenced here in a Wikipedia article for Mandalorian.

Now that the new Mandalorian series is 5 episodes deep, we've had at least two recurring characters who do not have a name. (Frankly, hearing the main protagonist keep being called "Mando" is getting annoying) Is it known whether this is typical of Mandalorian culture that they go unnamed? Could this be part and parcel that the protagonist does not have a signet, and maybe also does not have a reputation?

Wouldn't the fact that the protagonist is the subject of a galaxy-wide bounty be reason enough that he should be named?

I am asking simply to see if there are any in-universe reasons why we haven't heard any names for any of these Mandalorians yet.



Best Answer

No, you are correct. Most Mandalorians do have names...

The character is very much built on the iconic presence of the Man With No Name in the Sergio Leone movies, played by Clint Eastwood, [and] the lone samurai in Akira Kurosawa,” he said. “It’s aesthetically and very, very much narratively built in that kind of iconic lone gunslinger/sword-wielder.” -Pedro Pascal

As mentioned in a comment, actor Pedro Pascal had let his character's birth name slip in an early interview, but it had yet to be revealed on screen and/or with a lack of clarity that the character has kept his birth name, but the reveal of it implied, that while the series would intentionally play with 'The Man With No Name' allusions, it wouldn't do so forever...

Episode 1.08 (Redemption), the season one finale, changes that. His name is

Din Djarin. This is the same name Pascal let slip prior to the series start.

In addition, looking at this from an in-universe perspective, one reason Mandalorians might not as freely be giving out their names, is because in this era they are on the verge of extinction and are in hiding.

1.03 The Sin Transcript:

The Armorer: It will draw many eyes. These were cast in an Imperial smelter. These are the spoils of the Great Purge. The reason that we live hidden like sand rats. Our secrecy is our survival. Our survival is our strength. Our strength was once in our numbers. Now we live in the shadows and only come above ground one at a time. Our world was shattered by the Empire, with whom this coward shares tables.

The Mandalorian: The Empire is no longer. And the Beskar has returned.

The Armorer: When one chooses to walk the Way of the Mandalore, you are both hunter and prey. How can one be a coward if one chooses this way of life? Have you ever removed your helmet?

The Mandalorian: No.

The Armorer: Has it ever been removed by others?

The Mandalorian: Never.

The Armorer: This is the Way.

Episode 1.08 reconfirms these ideas that were laid out in 1.03 when the characters come across

a pile of armor and Djarin talks once more with The Armorer.




Pictures about "Is there a canonical reason that the protagonist of the Mandalorian is still unnamed?"

Is there a canonical reason that the protagonist of the Mandalorian is still unnamed? -  Flower Vase And Lamp On Black Vase on A Console Table
Is there a canonical reason that the protagonist of the Mandalorian is still unnamed? - Abstract background with white glassy drops
Is there a canonical reason that the protagonist of the Mandalorian is still unnamed? - Two Labeled  Bottles Of Wine Beside A Wine Glass By The Pool



Why does The Mandalorian have no name?

The Mandalorian was partially inspired by actor Clint Eastwood and his Man with No Name character (pictured) from the Dollars Trilogy by Sergio Leone.

Is Din Djarin no longer a Mandalorian?

The lack of knowledge about the force of the Jedi is surprising due to another seemingly significant plot point\u2014 the revelation of the Darksaber by Moff Gideon. Of course, the Darksaber is a lightsaber used by Tarre Vizsla, who was a Mandalorian. And a Jedi. Who could use the Force.

Why are the Jedi unknown in The Mandalorian?

Din is an "adopted" Mandalorian, since he wasn't born on Mandalore. Despite this, after defeating the Imperial Remnant's leader, Moff Gideon, the Mandalorian then acquired ownership of the Darksaber thus making him the rightful ruler of Mandalore.



The simple reason why The Mandalorian 'works' but the Sequel Trilogy did not




Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Mikhail Nilov, Mikhail Nilov, Karolina Grabowska, Engin Akyurt