Why did these containers stay at the same place?

Why did these containers stay at the same place? - Top view composition of shells assorted sizes arranged randomly on beige surface

I am no expert on marine logistics, but my understanding is that the prime purpose of shipping containers is to be filled with goods and moved around the world. In particular, there is little point in leaving a container in the same position at a cargo port for a long time.

Yet, in Dexter, there are two prominent containers which seem to have a permanent location:

  • The container where Dexter’s mother was killed and the Dark Passenger was born. It seems to be readily available more than thirty years later in the first and second season when the Ice Truck Killer and Dexter himself use it to stage their crimes. It is identified by some ID.

  • The container where Dexter kills Estrada and Debra kills Laguerta at the end of Season 7. It is available half a year later for Debra to reflect these events. It is identified by a bullet hole.

While containers are actually repurposed as permanent structures, none of the motivations seem to apply here and make little sense in the middle of an operating cargo port. Moreover, both of these containers are crime scenes, which makes them even less attractive to keep around.

Thus I am asking: Why were these containers never moved? What am I missing?



Best Answer

My answer is based on the comment thread below your question.

In this comment thread, we have established the following:

  • It is likely that the containers were decommissioned due to the police claiming it as evidence for the murders.
  • Due to the nature of the crimes, the containers will have been considered evidence for a long time, so replacements will have been used by the industry (if replacements were needed at all).
  • Given that the shipping industry cares little for what happens to an individual container (containers are interchangeable and relatively expendable, and they are only really useful when being shipped around), it's likely that these containers are not actively tracked by the administration anymore. No one was waiting for these specific containers to come back. If replacements were found, everyone stopped caring about the old containers.
  • (not explicitly discussed, but implicitly accepted as a logical consequence) The police did not retain ownership of the container, and gave it back to the company that owned it after the trial.
  • It's unlikely that the containers are in a "graveyard" for unusued containers, as Dexter has had to dodge workers to get to his container. This doesn't make it impossible, however. It's still possible for workers to visit the graveyard at one time or another.

On to my actual answer:

If the containers were indeed decommissioned, then it stands to reason that they are not administratively tracked anymore. This is a known phenomenon in warehouse systems. Anything that is not tracked can be ignored by workers for decades, as they are never looking for something that is no longer administratively known about.

Think about it from a business perspective. Who is going to complain about these containers?

Management?
They don't work in that zone, so they won't come across an errant container. And even if they did, why would they assume that the container shouldn't be there? Would they go to the effort of looking it up? It's not their job after all.

Employees?
Employees are not tasked with checking all the containers that are in the container yard. Instead, they get given an order to fetch a specific container.
If Dexter's container is no longer tracked by the system, then the system will never assign a worker to look for this container.

Furthermore, a worker does not occupy himself by questioning every container that he comes across.
Why would he? It would take a lot of time and effort, for something that would hardly ever be useful to do, and no one expecting him to do so.

As long as the container is not in anyone's way, no one will actually be incentivized to ever move the container or question its presence.




Pictures about "Why did these containers stay at the same place?"

Why did these containers stay at the same place? - Composition of different conchs on beige table
Why did these containers stay at the same place? - Set of conchs on beige surface
Why did these containers stay at the same place? - Set of black teaspoons on beige surface



Where did all the shipping containers go?

Many are in inland depots. Others are piled up in cargo ports, and the rest are onboard vessels, especially on transpacific lines.

How do containers stay on ships?

Containers are secured using twist locks and a series of lashing rods between the stack and bridges or hatch covers. Incorrect or inadequate securing can significantly reduce the stability of a container stack.

Why are all the shipping containers at sea?

The steel boxes are harder than ever to find as surging demand to restock inventories and a series of shipping disruptions has left many thousands of containers stranded at sea on ships anchored near jammed-up ports.

How shipping containers lock together?

The middle or \u201chigher tier\u201d containers are locked in with an automatic twist-lock. These mechanisms are attached when the unit is being raised from the pier onto the cargo ship. When the shipping container is positioned on top of another container the auto twist-lock pops into the lock position, locking them together.



Why shipping container homes are overrated




Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Karolina Grabowska, Karolina Grabowska, Karolina Grabowska, Karolina Grabowska