Why does Kathryn feel that she's already met Cole in 1990?

Why does Kathryn feel that she's already met Cole in 1990? - Photo of Man Walking on the Wall Side Using Cane

In the movie 12 Monkeys, in 1990, when Kathryn is meeting Cole for the first time in her life, she says:

James, where did you grow up? I have the strangest feeling I've met you before.

What is the implication of this? How could she have met Cole before this moment? Only Cole is the time traveler and as a young kid he's seen her at the airport.

Why does Kathryn feel that she's already met Cole in 1990?



Best Answer

You are right in your reasoning that in 1990 there was no time before yet when Kathryn could have met Cole. She only sees the young Cole in 1996 at the end of the film. However, I think there's two viewpoints we can approach this with, both hinged on the fact that the film presents us with a (largely) immutable timeline where the past can't be changed and everything that's going to happen will happen.

There is actually a way she could have seen him before and later in the film she realizes where. When Cole vanishes after kidnapping her, the police tell her that the bullet from Cole's wound is from World War I, which then makes her dig out an old photograph (from her own psychology research on doomsday prophets) which shows the naked Cole in a trench in World War I. This is what makes her suddenly believe his story. While she could have seen the photo only after 1990, there's nothing that precludes her from working on this stuff even before 1990. It's also unclear how much of an impression this photo might have made on her, but it's clear she knows it and has seen it before and immediately digs for it when hearing about the bullet. So the photo might very well have made at least somewhat of a faint impression to her.

But there is even more to it, if we extend the film's immutable timeline approach into a more metaphysical direction about fate and how not only humanity is doomed to bring its own demise but also how Kathryn's and Cole's lives are inherently bound together to this story. This is emphasized in the film when Kathryn sees young Cole at the airport when old Cole dies and how Cole dreamed about her his whole life beause of this.

It's the same dream I always have... I think it was always you.

In light of this entanglement of both their fates, we can see her little throwaway comment also as a more symbolic foreshadowing of this, an abstract feeling of familiarity, even if there was no actual way for her to ever have met him.




Pictures about "Why does Kathryn feel that she's already met Cole in 1990?"

Why does Kathryn feel that she's already met Cole in 1990? - Purple Flowers in Persons Hand
Why does Kathryn feel that she's already met Cole in 1990? - Man Beside Woman's Belly
Why does Kathryn feel that she's already met Cole in 1990? - Child Stepping on Macaroni



What is the meaning of the ending of 12 Monkeys?

The past can't be changed, we can only prevent for the future. In spite of the ambiguity in its ending, a key message of 12 Monkeys is that the past is fixed and can't actually be changed. We know that Cole witnesses his own death as a child, and always ends up at this point in 1996.

What was the virus in 12 Monkeys?

Kalavirus, also referred to in the scientific community as M5-10, is a plague that kills ninety-eight percent of the world population. Although not released directly by the Army of the 12 Monkeys, their guiding hand and influence in its creation and release is undeniable.

Is there a sequel to 12 Monkeys?

Syfy's \u201c12 Monkeys\u201d is neither a sequel nor a prequel; it's a reimagining that begins with the same premise but diverges quickly. In 2043, only remnants of the human race survive as a result of a plague that quickly killed billions 27 years earlier.

Who is the homeless guy in 12 Monkeys?

The Pallid Man is an unnamed member of the Army of the 12 Monkeys. He is the son of Mantis and Zalmon Shaw. He ultimately becomes a leader within the Army of the 12 Monkeys, second only to The Witness.



Cruel Intentions' Kathryn - Why She Wasn't the Real Villain




Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Eren Li, cottonbro, Andreza Vasconcelos, Tatiana Syrikova