Is there any correlation between the use of method acting and award or box office success?
Method acting as a concept has been around since the 1930s, derived from Stanislavski's system (predating the former by a few decades) of actors creating 'real' emotions by Meisner, Adler and Lewis.
Though it has evolved slightly over time, the core component is that the actor employing the technique of method acting 'becomes' the character they're playing by taking the (either hypothetical or explicit) psychological and emotional motivations of the character and making them their own.
Actors utilizing the techniques promoted by Stanislavski, Meisner, Adler or Lewis include: Marlon Brando, Robert DeNiro, Al Pacino, Daniel Day Lewis, Meryl Streep, Marilyn Monroe, etc. etc.
Is there any correlation between using these techniques and success (success being measured by awards, box office tallies, long career)?
Best Answer
I do not believe this question is inherently answerable. While we know of successful actors who "Ascribe" to "The Method" we don't have a full list nor we do really have a list of actors who don't.
You'd have to basically research each "Successful/Awarded" actor to get their comments on this acting approach. (I suggest using "Inside the Actor's Studio" as it's the best insight to a performer's approach). Granted you'd also have to examine their career as a whole. And honestly whether they use "The Method" or just give it public lip service.
We can say that the famous actors who've credited "The Method" give some sense of credibility, but the field is so wide that you can't correlate based only on those who've satisfied the requirement of one point of correlation.
We really don't have a huge list of actors who use "The Method" who don't get famous or Famous actors who poopoo on "The Method"
Pictures about "Is there any correlation between the use of method acting and award or box office success?"
Why do actors use method acting?
Method acting is a technique or type of acting in which an actor aspires to encourage sincere and emotionally expressive performances by fully inhabiting the role of the character.Is method acting effective?
Their responsibility is to draw connections and pull raw emotions from the actor to connect with the character. Under professional supervision, method acting proves safe and effective. Many actors find the practice of method acting cathartic, similar to psychiatrist Jacob L. Moreno's psychodrama.How does method acting affect actors?
Method acting is a technique that separates good actors from the all-time greats. This training means going beyond portraying the character in an attempt to literally become them. These committed actors sacrifice their mind, body and spirit to transform into the characters we'll never forget.What is the advantage of being a method actor?
The 'Method' in method acting As a result, method acting often leads to a more realistic and less stylized performance. Focusing on inhibiting a character's psyche is useful in achieving believable delivery. Depending on the tone of the film, the Method can be a useful technique for actors to approach their roles.Times Method Actors Took Things Way Too Far
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Sora Shimazaki, Ivan Samkov, cottonbro, MockupEditor.com