@Midnight end credits

@Midnight end credits - Woman in Black Leather Jacket Sitting on Brown Wooden Floor

At the end of Comedy Central's show @Midnight they show the audience during the end credits. They seem to often show the same audience which includes sleeping people, and a couple furries (a panda and a rabbit I think, as of today, when I decide to finally ask about it, either the site or my 'net access cuts of the episodes). I was wondering if anyone knew why they would repeat this audience sometimes, but not always. Maybe it is always now, but I don't think it always was.

I'd love to provide a screenshot, but didn't find one, nor could I capture one as the CC site's streams are cutting off consistently at 21 minutes for me right now, sometimes in the middle of a sentence.

Anyone know why the repetition or why it's not 100% consistent?



Best Answer

According to this twitter conversation, it always the same clip every episode.

...why do you use a canned audience shot for the credit role? You have a live audience...— The Rt. Hon. Cadbury (@Rt_Hon_Cadbury) February 15, 2014
...because it's a joke...— Chris Hardwick (@hardwick)February 15, 2014



Pictures about "@Midnight end credits"

@Midnight end credits - Yellow and Black Wooden Cabinet
@Midnight end credits - Cheerful young African American male student in casual clothes throwing college papers up in air while having fun in green park after end of exams
@Midnight end credits - Unrecognizable female showing burning paper with written inscription and bright flame on blurred background





Midnight Run - End Titles




More answers regarding @Midnight end credits

Answer 2

In my hypothesis, they most likely work for the show and the characters in the suits/costumes are Chris Hardwick, Tom Lennon, and someone else who cannot / won't be [seen] in the audience. The show is required to pay any member of the audience a minimum fee for appearing in front of the camera, (viewers of the old Craig Ferguson should have seen him employ this trick too). Rather than pay a new audience I suppose it was decided it would be a nice gift / reoccurring bonus for their staff given the show is aired to often.

I have no proof, just sneaking suspicion, but would love anyone to poke holes in this as well. If as I thought, this would be just another example of how rules can be bent and perhaps broken in this case. By simply interpreting the law / union rules in your favor, Silly lawyer trick to defraud the network using pre-established SAG / equivalent guidelines. [OR] Magnanimous Robin Hood giving back to those that need it the most (the workers rather than the network; proletariat v bourgeoisie). Guess it's a matter of your perspective. The more you know.

Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: MART PRODUCTION, cottonbro, Ketut Subiyanto, Vickie Intili