What is Bismuth's view on the "shattering" of Pink Diamond?
If Bismuth knows that Rose's sword can only poof gems, and not shatter them (since she was the one who made the sword to begin with), did she know the "shattering" was fake; or did she not bother to think about it? Bismuth must not have been at the location, because she would have had suspicions that something was off.
Should this be moved to a discussion or is this an okay question?
Best Answer
There isn't anything intrinsic about Rose's sword that makes it unable to shatter gems. As we can see with Amethyst's cracked gem in the first season, a gem can be cracked or shattered with enough force directly applied, not just with special weapons such as the Breaking Point, which is specially designed to shatter gems directly rather than attacking and poofing their forms.
Thus, I see no reason to believe Bismuth suspected that Pink Diamond's shattering was fake.
Pictures about "What is Bismuth's view on the "shattering" of Pink Diamond?"
Did Bismuth know about Pink Diamond?
Bismuth would know that Pink Diamond wasn't really shattered because the sword isn't capable of shattering Gems. Gems Across the Cosmos, I also thought of what you said. Bismuth really got an idea to shatter Gems because of Pink Diamond's fake shattering and thinks Rose would do something of shattering a Diamond.Did Pink Diamond abuse pink Pearl?
Then, Pink Pearl explains that the reason why she has a cracked eye is that Pink Diamond got angry after all of the times she asked for and was denied a colony. She threw a fit and accidentally hit Pink Pearl with her "destructive" powers.What episode does Steven tell Bismuth about Pink Diamond?
A Single Pale Rose"A Single Pale Rose"Steven Universe episodeRose Quartz becomes Pink Diamond, revealing that they are the same Gem.Episode no.Season 5 Episode 18Directed byKi-Young Bae (animation) Jin-Hee Park (animation) Kat Morris (supervising) Liz Artinian (art)10 more rowsWhat the Heck is Bismuth? (Growing Metal Crystals)
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Mikhail Nilov, Mikhail Nilov, Mikhail Nilov, Mikhail Nilov