What is so special about the Flying V in ice hockey?

What is so special about the Flying V in ice hockey? - Photo of White Drone Quadcopter Flying Near Trees at Noontime

In The Mighty Ducks movies (D1, D2, D3), the team's signature move is the Flying V. What exactly does it achieve?

Here is the formation from the first movie. Flying V from D1

It looks like the point is for the 4 players on the sides to take out the defense in order to give the middle player a shot at the goal. Flying V from D1 in action

But that's not what happens in the second movie:

(The German team just seems to be watching them skate forward together in the inverted V formation, and then Jesse Hall shoots and scores.)

In the third movie, the formation is disrupted by a player simply attacking the lead player in the formation and taking the puck (sorry, couldn't find a video): enter image description here

Now the ducks have given the opposing team a free run with just the goalie for defense: enter image description here

(I do realise their weak defense was a plot point for the third movie.)

If the point of the formation is to protect the middle player, why is it an inverted V? The middle player is in front of his teammates, and the opposing players can reach him before his teammates can protect him (as seen in the third movie). How is the Flying V effective?



Best Answer

The Flying V doesn't actually have a use in NHL or anything above Bantam, if at all. It's based on the idea that the defense will retreat, which almost never happens because most defenses use a forecheck strategy. On a penalty kill, maybe, but still, on a penalty kill the object of the offense is to spread out and create gaps in the defense. With a Flying V, the offense is bunched together, which is absolutely the worst thing to do when you're on offense.

As Tetsujin mentioned, the Flying V ties in to the way ducks actually travel, and it's a cool and catchy way to create team unity. But, in the real world, it's a useless offensive strategy.




Pictures about "What is so special about the Flying V in ice hockey?"

What is so special about the Flying V in ice hockey? - Red Helicopter on Top of Foggy Mountain
What is so special about the Flying V in ice hockey? - An Airplane On Flight
What is so special about the Flying V in ice hockey? - Curling stones and brooms in house



Does the Flying V work in hockey?

Believe it or not, the Flying V has been tried -- at least in part -- deliberately in the NHL. Habs did do the Flying V last night, not once, but *three* times in a row. Failed the first, got an entry, third one worked!

Is the flying VA real play?

Share All sharing options for: The Montreal Canadiens actually tried the Flying V - and it worked. It all started with an innocent tweet from Sportsnet's Eric Engels. That's right, they actually tried a modified version of the Flying V from the Mighty Ducks movie. In an NHL game.

Is a triple deke real?

The triple deke is one of the most legendary moves in all of hockey. Made famous by Gordon Bombay (and later imitated by Charlie Conway), the triple deke is the perfect move when you absolutely have to score in a shootout.

Who invented the knuckle puck in Mighty Ducks?

Knucklepuck. Another relic of The Mighty Ducks' early-'90s setting is the conceit that not one but two of the team's biggest offensive weapons are defensemen with big shots from the point: Fulton and Russ Tyler, the creator of the knucklepuck.



Edmonton Oilers Use The Flying V




More answers regarding what is so special about the Flying V in ice hockey?

Answer 2

Do you actually want to know how/why/if it would be effective in a real game, or would you be satisfied simply with the correlation of it as a motif?

Real ducks fly in a V-shape… a literal 'flying V' which is aerodynamically efficient.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_formation

enter image description here

Presumably, if they'd been called "The Mighty Wildebeest" the formation & plot device would have had to invent a different series of reasons for them adopting whatever formation that took.. but would probably lose something in translation.

Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: invisiblepower, Silvia Corradin, Stephan Müller, SHVETS production