Why was the Clash of the Titans remake so radically different from the original?

Why was the Clash of the Titans remake so radically different from the original? - Overhead view of different small seashells and green seaweed and corals on grey background

The remake of The Clash of the Titans is radically different from the original, but does keep a couple of elements the same. Why did Louis Leterrier decide to have the remake be so radically different and introduce other elements into the movie?



Best Answer

Louis Leterrier was a huge fan of the original film, but, as he put it:

I watched the original again. I went to a shop and bought the DVD and the stuff I love was still there. But it’s funny: memory is the best editor. So it was like, Oh, really? This was in it? It’s that simple? He goes on a journey because he fell in love with her? Really? I felt like what needed the most work was not the creatures, because they were fantastic (and, yes, we use different technology to bring them to life). It was really the story and the motivation. Why would this guy go on this suicide mission, this impossible mission, for the love of a princess? That was not working for me.

Therefore he kept some of the principal characters and monsters, but created a new version of the story. Incidentally, it should be noted that his film was effectively butchered in editing by the 'suits' - and Io's arc was drastically altered to make her Perseus' lover, not his sister as originally filmed. You can read more insights here: Vanity Fair Article on the Clash of the Titans Remake




Pictures about "Why was the Clash of the Titans remake so radically different from the original?"

Why was the Clash of the Titans remake so radically different from the original? - Top view of whole and half of fresh chicken eggs with yolk representing uniqueness concept
Why was the Clash of the Titans remake so radically different from the original? - Top view of palette of vibrant colorful lines with different shades in row forming abstract background
Why was the Clash of the Titans remake so radically different from the original? - Top view of different types and colors American dollars placed together on each other



Which Clash of the Titans is more accurate?

Greek Mythology is pretty specific about the Titans, naming twelve to start with and having a relatively short family tree with their children. In fact, the Titans are slightly more accurately conceived in Immortals and Wrath of the Titans, the 2012 sequel to the Clash remake.

Did they remake Clash of the Titans?

Clash of the Titans is a 2010 action fantasy film and remake of the 1981 film of the same name produced by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (the rights to which had been acquired by Warner Bros. in 1996 through its purchase of Turner). The story is very loosely based on the Greek myth of Perseus.

Who did the special effects for the movie Clash of the Titans?

Ray Harryhausen, special effects guru behind 'Clash of the Titans,' 'Golden Voyage of Sinbad,' dead at 92. Ray Harryhausen, the legendary special effects designer who breathed life into mythological beasts and inspired generations of sci-fi filmmakers with his trademark stop-motion animation, died Monday in London.

Is Clash of the Titans based on a true story?

Clash of the Titans is a 1981 fantasy adventure film directed by Desmond Davis and written by Beverley Cross which is loosely based on the Greek myth of Perseus. It stars Harry Hamlin, Judi Bowker, Burgess Meredith, Maggie Smith and Laurence Olivier.



Why The 2010 Remake Of Clash Of The Titans Is Better Than The Original - EssenceOfMedia




Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Brett Sayles, Julia Filirovska, Enric Cruz López, Karolina Grabowska