Is Quentin Tarantino's scene in Pulp Fiction meant to feel different from the rest of the movie?
Quentin Tarantino's cameo in Pulp Fiction has been widely panned. I have rewatched his scenes and I agree that it is a jarring performance – when Tarantino is on the screen it feels like the fourth wall has been cracked; when the camera returns to the "real" actors it feels like we are back in the movie and not just watching actors. But I can't explain: why?
Was there possibly a deliberate directorial decision behind the feel of these scenes being different? Is the audience meant to feel jarred by the change of location and/or viewpoint, perhaps? Could the fact that Jimmie is a seeming outsider to the life of the main characters possibly have something to do with it?
Has Tarantino or anybody else associated with the movie given any indication that the change of style/pace/feel of the scenes set at Jimmie's house is due to anything other than Tarantino's acting skill (or lack thereof)?
Best Answer
According to CinemaBlend.com:
Robert Rodriguez Directed Quentin Tarantino's Scene In Pulp Fiction It's always good to have a friend. Ever since they premiered their debut films at the 1992 Sundance Film Festival, Quentin Tarantino and Robert Rodriguez have been thick as thieves and frequent collaborators, resulting in notable team-ups like From Dusk Till Dawn and Grindhouse. They've also played a hand in each other's movies, unsurprisingly, with Tarantino directing a sequence in Sin City and Rodriguez calling the shots during Tarantino's scene in Pulp Fiction.
It's hard to pull off double duty, after all. While there are multi-taskers in Hollywood who can direct and act at once, including Clint Eastwood and Ben Affleck, when you're as detail-orientated as Tarantino, it can be extremely challenging to do both jobs simultaneously. Thankfully, Rodriguez was there to ghost-direct Tarantino's memorable moment so that the filmmaker could focus squarely on his performance. Rodriguez is a good pal.
So, a different directorial vision means subtle differing feel for the scene, in general. The fourth wall was never explicitly broken during Pulp Fiction, including within this scene, and I don't really agree with your depiction of that scene, but that can be chalked up to our differing viewer experiences.
Pictures about "Is Quentin Tarantino's scene in Pulp Fiction meant to feel different from the rest of the movie?"
What is the point of the dance scene in Pulp Fiction?
Tarantino repurposed that idea into the Pulp Fiction dance scene, juxtaposing the sweetness and friendliness of the dance. Thus creating a sharp contrast to the world that this gangster and gangster's wife come from. Tarantino's love of pop culture references permeates the film.What was the point of the Gimp in Pulp Fiction?
Apparently, The Gimp is a hitchiker who fell victim to Maynard and his brother. Plus, Tarantino intended for the poor guy to die by the end of the film: \u201cIt doesn't quite play this way in the movie, but in my mind when I wrote it, the Gimp's dead. Butch knocked him out and then when he passed out he hung himself.What makes Pulp Fiction different?
Nothing is said just to be said, or to fill screen time. Every word has a purpose. Pulp Fiction achieved success with its inventive shuffling of continuity and its memorable performances, but dialogue is what has solidified it as a true modern classic. Pulp Fiction is one of the most quotable movies ever written.What is the most iconic scene of Pulp Fiction?
10 Best Pulp Fiction Scenes That Fans Still Think About TodayThe Untold Truth Of Quentin Tarantino
More answers regarding is Quentin Tarantino's scene in Pulp Fiction meant to feel different from the rest of the movie?
Answer 2
'Opinions are like assholes: everybody has one': Inspector "Dirty" Harry Callahan, 'The Dead Pool'.
Here's mine: Quentin Tarantino is not a bad actor; he plays limited character types. He's certainly fantastic at learning lots of lines, delivering them rapid fire and playing awkward types.
Given that he writes the scripts, all the words are in his authorial voice, so when he delivers the lines too, we're getting double that voice. Perhaps that's what makes it uncomfortable for some people to hear. I think because he writes them, he's so familiar with them and it enables him to rattle off lines quickly, lending his characters a nervous, shifty energy.
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Maria Orlova, George Milton, Alex Green, Amina Filkins