Why did the game not get terminated when the majority voted to stop the game

Why did the game not get terminated when the majority voted to stop the game - Crop anonymous child getting brown stones from white container at home

After the first game, the remaining players decide to take a vote to stop the game.

Before the vote, the following is told:

[masked manager] If you wish to give up on playing, the 25.5 billion won will be sent to the bereaved families of the late players, 100 million won each. However, you will all return home empty-handed.

The majority votes to stop.

[masked manager] The majority of the players have voted to terminate the game. Therefore, this game is now terminated.


But a few days later most are back, the money is still there. And they continue with the second game.

If the game was actually terminated then:

  1. The money would have been given to the bereaved families.
  2. The game would have been restarted instead of continued from game 2


Best Answer

In Korean, if I hear correctly, they say ?? ?? ??? ?? ????? which can be translated by "the game will be stopped now".

But ?? has a few different meanings (see this Youtube video):

  1. "to cancel": to end an agreement.
  2. "to call of": to have to stop something that was already started.
  3. "to postpone"
  4. "to shelve": to not continue with a plan although you might continue later.

My Korean is not good enough to understand the rest of the explanation of the rules, or to understand whether the phrasing was left ambiguous by the organizers.

The game is a representation of the struggles of our society, in particular capitalism. We can guess that the meaning of the episode is that the ruling class can bend the rules to its liking, even when the lower class is given some power to choose, and that even if you try to extract yourself from the system, you will have to come back to it eventually.




Pictures about "Why did the game not get terminated when the majority voted to stop the game"

Why did the game not get terminated when the majority voted to stop the game -
Why did the game not get terminated when the majority voted to stop the game - Free stock photo of adult, band, bar
Why did the game not get terminated when the majority voted to stop the game - Person Holding Black Chess Piece



Why did the old man vote to stop the game?

Once Squid Game reveals the twist that the Old Man was in charge of the games the entire time, it was clear that the reason he pressed no was that he wanted each player to return on their own accord, knowing it could mean death.

Why did the old man play in Squid Game?

The character reveals that he is extremely rich and at was at a point in his life where he was bored. Having everything he wanted didn't leave him happy and so he created the game to have some \u201cfun\u201d.

How did the old man survive in Squid Game?

However, unbeknownst to Gi-hun at the time, Il-nam survives his loss because of his secret identity as the games' founder. He was clearly okay with dying in the games, as earlier rounds wouldn't have allowed him to survive after losing, but he lets Gi-hun go forward anyway.

What is 001 name in Squid Game?

Player 001's real name is Oh Il-nam, which he tells Gi-hun before his faked death. He confirms this again in the final episode. The character's name literally translates to "first man" in English: "Il" (\uc77c) means one, and "nam" (\ub0a8) means man.



(AGT8E4) [Game Theory] Voting: Majority Rule




More answers regarding why did the game not get terminated when the majority voted to stop the game

Answer 2

First of all, the organizers likely expected at least some of the players to return, because pretty much all of them had financial issues and nothing else to lose.

  1. Because then the cash prize would be decreased. Cash prize at the start is set to 0. Each player is valued for a 100 million Won, and the death of each player adds 100 million to the prize. If they send the cash to families of the dead players, that would decrease the total prize.

  2. Because it wasn't a new game. They resumed it with the players who were in the original pool.

Answer 3

After several of the players who voted to continue the game voiced their willingness to continue without the others, there was a statement by Front Man that the games may resume if the majority decided to (as noted above, all but 14 re-joined when given the opportunity).

While not stated in the original three rules that were on the consent form, it does seem consistent with their philosophy of what is considered "fair", especially as it as appears that the minority who didn't decide to re-join were left alone.

Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Tatiana Syrikova, RODNAE Productions, cottonbro, Olha Ruskykh