Is it necessary to watch Episodes 1-3 before watching "The Force Awakens" and "The Last Jedi"?
I have seen the original Star Wars trilogy (Star Wars, The Empire Strikes Back and The Return of the Jedi). I started watching Episode 1, but didn't finish it and didn't watch its sequels. But now I want to watch The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi.
Do I need to watch Episodes 1-3 or can I fully enjoy and understand the new movies without having seen them?
No. It is not necessary to watch episodes I-III.
Having seen all the films released to date, I can definitely say that you can enjoy Force Awakens without needing to see Episodes I, II, and III.
There are a couple of little in jokes, but you won't notice them, and they don't detract from the plot.
If you're planning on watching Rogue One, it does help to have seen Episode III to link to a single moment, but it's not critical.
Obviously I can't be certain about Last Jedi, but its unlikely you'll need anything from the prequels to enjoy it.
Pictures about "Is it necessary to watch Episodes 1-3 before watching "The Force Awakens" and "The Last Jedi"?"
Do I have to watch Star Wars 1 2 and 3?No. It is not necessary to watch episodes I-III. Having seen all the films released to date, I can definitely say that you can enjoy Force Awakens without needing to see Episodes I, II, and III. There are a couple of little in jokes, but you won't notice them, and they don't detract from the plot.
Can you skip Star Wars 1 3?And then the Prequels that is 1,2,3. You can actually skip 1 if you want to. It's really bad. But the thing is original trilogy is the movie that defines what Star Wars really is.
Do I need to watch force awakens before last Jedi?These two movies respond to the Original Trilogy with a similar approach, not afraid to contextualize the beloved trilogy in critical ways. If you're looking to set the tone for The Last Jedi, don't worry about re-watching The Force Awakens.
Can I watch Star Wars The Force awakens without watching the others?No, you don't need to see the previous Star Wars films to enjoy The Force Awakens. The movie stands very well on its own.
My friend watches EVERY Star Wars movie for the FIRST time
More answers regarding is it necessary to watch Episodes 1-3 before watching "The Force Awakens" and "The Last Jedi"?
I will expand on kappa's answer on the order watching question in order to provide an answer here.
The short answer is NO, you don't HAVE to watch Episodes 1-3 in order to enjoy Episode 7 (and presumably Episode 8, but it's too early to tell).
However, by NOT watching the prequel trilogy, you will be missing out on a lot of universe-defining lore. This is a brief list of important points that the prequel trilogy covers that adds depth to the Star Wars cannon:
- the history of the Skywalker family
- the origins of R2D2 and C-3PO
- the history of the Sith and their influence on the empire and the galaxy at large
- the clone wars
- the origins of Boba Fett
- Anakin being subdued to the dark side
- what happened to the Jedi
- and many more things
Episode 7 does a very good job of taking the universe as it was established in the previous movies and expanding on them. While no particular plot point depends on having previous knowledge, knowing how things evolved adds a lot of depth to the decisions that characters make in the series.
As others have said I believe you can see The Force Awakens without ever seeing the prequels, as the story itself is mostly introductory and relates more to the the Original Trilogy, than the Prequel Era...
However, The Force Awakens, because it is both a family saga story and uses "ring" story telling, does in fact incorporate elements and juxtaposes all six previous saga films. This is done to better define Star Wars Saga films and establish its themes.
There is no Wikipedia on "ring storytelling" but more or less it's a construction theory (Ring Theory/Chiastic Structure) that relates to the way Star Wars has been designed/constructed to "echo" itself with either circular and/or parallel story telling.
According to the seven conventions of ring composition laid out by Mary Douglas in Thinking in Circles, a ring generally includes an introductory section that introduces the characters and provides important context for the following sections. The introductory section also states the major themes of the work. After all, a ring, says Douglas, is a “construction of parallelisms that must open a theme, develop it, and round it off by bringing the conclusion back to the beginning.” 1 . http://nerdist.com/star-wars-ring-theory-offers-a-whole-new-way-to-view-the-prequels/
Note: The link above provides much insight into Star Wars' first two trilogies specifically, and much like this question, it points out even why The Phantom Menace is important to the series as a whole.
One clear example in Star Wars Saga is: Each first film, in each trilogy, features a protagonist witnessing an older beloved "good" character die in battle with a villainous character, which is used to push the story forward, usually through the protagonist watching.
- The Phantom Menace:
Obi-Wan witness his Master Qui-Gon Jin be killed by Darth Maul, which pushes Obi-Wan to change his mind on training Anakin
- A New Hope: Luke Skywalker witness Obi-Wan Kenobi be killed by fighting Darth Vader, which pushes him to follow through on becoming a Jedi and dealing with Vader.
- The Force Awakens:
Rey (Finn and Chewbacca) witness Han Solo be killed by Kylo Ren, pushes Rey to stay the course and find Luke.
Note: The differences are the amounts of people witnessing the older good character's deaths and that older Obi-Wan chooses to die, rather than be killed in A New Hope, but The Force Awakens shows the most variation, as this battle is not between multiple force users like the previous two, but it also juxtaposes scenes from Empire Strikes Back and Attack of Clones by being "on bridges", and the battle at the end of The Return of the Jedi being a "father and son" conflict.
This kind of story telling works to support not only a family generational story, but a family generational story set in a METAPHYSICAL universe (ie: The FORCE), where there may be a question of "probable outcomes" or is facilitating FATE by history repeating itself in some way...
Prequel Elements in The Force Awakens:
Rey's existence on Jakku for instance, is closer to, but really is worse than, Anakin's and Shmi's on Tatooine, than Luke's, and is highlighting a similar story with upbringings of repression. (One may even speculate that Shmi's early life before having Anakin, could have looked a lot like Rey's depending on when she became Watto's slave and/or how she could have existed before becoming a slave). Like [child] Anakin also (The Phantom Menace), Rey is afraid to leave home, in relation to family. Luke looses his family and has nothing to gain by staying.
Kylo Ren also conveys parallels with teenage+ Anakin himself in terms of fits of rage, seemingly being on the dark side and serving a high ranking official, and because, for whatever yet to be disclosed reason, he believes he is supposed to "finish" what Darth Vader started and seems to be trying to communicate to Vader from the beyond. It should be noted though he was corrupted at a lot younger age than Anakin.
There is also Anakin's Lightsaber from Revenge of the Sith that Luke once had, but lost in the Empire Strikes Back.
It calls to Rey in the Force Awakens and she uses it to battle Kylo Ren, and he believes it belongs to to him, not her...
The Last Jedi - UPDATE
The Last Jedi ends up being rather unusual for a Star Wars film in this particular section of it's franchise, because it operates on a theme of uncertainty and series of ruse, whose definitive meanings are yet to be established, because more questions are raised, then "solid" answers have been given.
The theme of uncertainty ties into the franchise in a few ways, such as with the prequels with Anakin's turn to the Dark Side and the fall of The Republic & Jedi. The Jedi's fall being furthered by a lack of transparency on their part, not being able to live up to their own standards (for various reasons), and through philosophical critiquing of the Jedi belief system pushed by Palpatine through Anakin's over emotional nature (chosen one = high midichlorian count) and sometimes tragic experiences. In addition the theme of uncertainty was probably felt through the presentation of Darth Vader when he first was seen on screen in 1977, and furthered by the revelation of Luke's (and Leia's) parentage.
With that being said, I feel one can not begin appreciate what The Last Jedi offers without seeing either the Original Trilogy and The Prequels.
* * * *SPOILER WARNING
The Following are Easter eggs (references, allusions, elements) relating to the Prequel Era, which again can be used to solidify the Saga Films overall themes:
Main Characters riding on large beasts - In The Last Jedi Finn and Rose ride a Fathier. Twice in the prequels we see characters also ride large beasts. Obi-Wan Kenobi rides Bobo (Revenge of the Sith), and Anakin, Padme`, and Obi-Wan together ride a Petranaki Arena Beast, Reek. (Attack of the Clones)
Juxtapositions to Revenge of Sith: Former master & apprentice epic showdowns (which was also referenced in teaser poster. See below) with Luke & Kylo Ren (and Rey) = Obi-wan Kenobi & Anakin (respectively). Rey's & Kylo Ren's exchanges during certain parts of the film are similar to Padmés & Anakin's on Mustafar (dark sexual subtext, visually similar),
Like Daughter, Like Mother. Leia looks out over the battlefield towards the end of The Last Jedi. There is a nearly identical shot of Padmé featured in The Phantom Menace.
Gambling and Racing - Canto Bright Casino features Fathier Racing, in which wealthy patrons bet on. Similarly, crime lords, like the Hutts, bet on pod racing on Tatooine, featured in The Phantom Menace,
Golden Age Hollywood Aesthic or character types - Canto Bight Patrons have a 30's-50's elitist look to them (this part of TLJ was inspired by To Catch A Thief) Throughout the prequels there are other elements, such as some Art Nouveau Motifs on Naboo (The Phantom Menace) or the casting choice of Christopher Lee channeling Gothic-Horror Byronic Hero types of 40's & 50's Horror cinema ("Count" Dooku in similitude with someone like "Count" Dracula, which Lee played Dracula in 1958).
"Laser Sword" & Spin Piloting Maneuver - The terminology laser sword, referring to lightsabers, was uttered by Luke on Ach-to was first used by young Anakin Skywalker. Anakin Skywalker also used a spinning piloting maneuver the same as Kylo Ren. (The Phantom Menace).
Seismic Charges (noise) - There is a noise made when Holdo does her daring maneuver. This seismic charge noise was also featured with a scene with Jango Fett in Attack of the Clones.
Luke Skywalker refers to Darth Sidious by his more commonly used prequel-era name, Palpatine.
Ideas such as Rey being the 'light that rises up to meet the darkness' and Snoke suggesting that Rey and Kylo Ren in some way equivocate "the balance of the force" is reminiscent to the Prophecy of Anakin Skywalker being "The Chosen One" (The Phantom Menace, Revenge of the Sith).
The surprising departure of Supreme Leader Snoke is also similar to the near-death departure of Darth Maul (The Phantom Menace).
Evidence of key Revenge of the Sith scene inspiring The Last Jedi
...Kylo was left kneeling on the plains of Crait, with the illusion of Han Solo's dice fading away and him "looking out" at Rey almost longingly before she departed with the other surviving Resistance members. As it turns out, when director Rian Johnson was writing Kylo's last scene in The Last Jedi, he was inspired by the moment in Revenge of the Sith when Anakin was transformed into the cybernetic Darth Vader.
"I think that's such a beautiful notion of 'What does he regret in that moment,' the same way I think about in Revenge of the Sith, that mask is coming down, that beautiful shot of Anakin and his eyes right before it goes over and you see that glimpse of 'Is it fear? Is it regret? What is it? What is going through his mind at that moment?' That's that kind of moment for Ben and I don't want to put that moment in your guys' head. I feel like that's a moment that everyone should read into themselves." -Rian Johnson
Watched Last Jedi last night and can confirm that nothing of note in the prequel trilogy is referenced in the movie.
There are a couple of references to some events in Revenge of the Sith, but the references don't need you to have seen the film to understand it.
Is it necessary to watch Episodes 1-3 before watching “The Force Awakens” and “The Last Jedi”? Do I need to watch Episodes 1-3 or can I fully enjoy and understand the new movies without having seen them?
You do not need episodes 1-3 to "enjoy and understand" The Force Awakens or The Last Jedi. It is not "necessary" to watch them. As is, The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi stand on their own without 1-6 or Rogue One.
The back story of episodes 4-6 are more directly relevant, but episodes 1-3 are less so. Consistent with the "kill the past" theme in The Last Jedi, TFA and TLJ stand on their own without the previous films. You will, however, want to watch The Force Awakens prior to The Last Jedi as TLJ is a direct sequel to TFA.
Your appreciation of the "Star Wars" world and all the side characters will certainly be enhanced, but the narrative supporting TFA's main character (Ren) and main supporting character (Finn) doesn't require any of the other films. All a movie needs is an epic hero, a believable world and interesting side-characters. By that standard, The Force Awakens and The Last Jedi are both movies which can be enjoyed and understood without watching episodes 1-3.
Started watching 'Episode 1', could not bear it
If you could not bear watching episode 1, then there is simply no good reason at all to watch episodes 1, 2, and 3. That which you could not bear in episode 1 is repeated and expanded upon ad nauseum. You won't miss a thing in terms of story and given your dislike, watching them may otherwise detract from your enjoyment of the others. You can do just as well to read the plot summaries on imdb dot com or wikipedia.
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Sy Donny, Andrea Piacquadio, Brett Jordan, Brett Jordan