Why not teleport instead of taking a transport?

Why not teleport instead of taking a transport? - Free stock photo of airbus, aircraft, airplane

Early on in Star Trek Into Darkness (2013), after the scene where Khan shoots up the council, Kirk and Spock are making their way to the Enterprise. They are on a shuttle which takes them off-world. My question is, why did they take a shuttle instead of teleporting or beaming on the ship?



Best Answer

In-universe, this is (sorta) covered in the film's official novelisation. The ship is being supplied with a wide range of consumables at far shorter notice than was expected. Presumably the transporters are otherwise occupied moving cargo that's too heavy (or large) to fit onto the shuttles, leaving the shuttles to physically carry the crew from the surface.

The source of those responsibilities appeared not long after the shuttle cleared the ionosphere: the immense orbiting facility that was Starfleet dock. As the shuttlecraft slowed on approach, Kirk was able to pick out his ship waiting in place. Like worker ants attending a queen, a swarm of small support craft darted silently around her, preparing and supplying her for imminent departure. A small smile creased his face. There were other ships in dock, but like anyone thoroughly smitten, he had eyes only for his beloved.


Out of universe, the scene was almost certainly written as a 'walk-n-talk' so that Spock, Bones and Kirk could have a expository conversation about the mission (and then be interrupted by Carol Marcus) without having to explain why they're all sitting around on the ship having a conversation instead of working with their respective departments, getting ready to set off.

It also serves as a "ship porn" shot, allowing adoring fans to gain a well-lit view of the exterior of the ship from multiple angles. This is something which is common to most trek films and almost certainly drew its inspiration from the infamous drydock scene in Star Trek: The Motion Picture




Pictures about "Why not teleport instead of taking a transport?"

Why not teleport instead of taking a transport? - White Passenger Plane on Air during Sunset
Why not teleport instead of taking a transport? - An Airplane About to Take off Under Evening Sky
Why not teleport instead of taking a transport? - Boy Taking Picture of Dog on Vintage Camera



Is teleport and transport the same thing?

In the quantum world, teleportation involves the transportation of information, rather than the transportation of matter. Quantum teleportation involves two distant, entangled particles in which the state of a third particle instantly "teleports" its state to the two entangled particles.

Why teleportation is not possible?

In reality, we can't pass particles of matter through most materials because they interact too strongly with the atoms inside. That gets to the key problem with any kind of teleportation: The matter making up our bodies obeys rules that aren't conducive to speeding across open space and through barriers.

Is teleportation a form of transportation?

Teleportation is the transportation of an object or person from one location to another without traveling any physical distance by an object/person.

What are the benefits of teleportation?

\u201cTeleportation will enable the transfer of quantum information in the form of quantum states from one place to another, thereby forming a quantum network. One advantage of a quantum network is that information can be transferred with absolute privacy. Messages cannot be intercepted and read by eavesdroppers.\u201d



Will we ever be able to teleport? - Sajan Saini




Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Quang Nguyen Vinh, Quang Nguyen Vinh, Quang Nguyen Vinh, EKATERINA BOLOVTSOVA