What's the meaning behind Khan's firing on the Enterprise as it approaches the Mutara Nebula?
About 80% of the way down in the Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan movie script,
[Reliant bridge]
JOACHIM: If they go in there we'll lose them.
KHAN: Explain it to them.
[Enterprise bridge]
SAAVIK: That was close.
KIRK: They just don't want us going in there.
SPOCK: One minute to nebula perimeter.
After Khan's "Explain it to them" command, the pursuing Reliant fires a shot towards the rear of the fleeing Enterprise. This occurs at about the 0:53 point in
Khan's statement, and that there's only one shot fired, implies it has a symbolic meaning. I believe this was meant to be something like "A shot across the bow". The Wiktionary shot across the bow page gives a reasonable idiomatic meaning of
A warning that negative consequences will be faced if something is carried out or allowed to continue.
This fits with Khan's statement of "Explain it to them" (although this is redundant since Khan would know that Kirk already realizes there are negative consequences, regardless of what Kirk does or doesn't do). Nonetheless, the potential "negative consequences" of the Enterprise entering the Mutara Nebula would usually likely be less than if the ship remains outside. Also, although Kirk's statement of "They just don't want us going in there" would fit my proposed meaning, even a close shot from behind will not cause the Enterprise to change its course much, if at all, or do anything else to slow down its approach. If anything, the Reliant firing on the Enterprise should cause Kirk to want to enter the nebula even more for its relative safety, thus doing the opposite of what the potential stated intention is!
My question is if something similar to "A shot across a bow" is basically the intended meaning behind Khan's statement & the fired shot and, if not, then what does that scene mean, e.g., it was just included for dramatic effect?
Best Answer
Khan wanted the Enterprise intact. He was hoping that Kirk would rather give the ship up than see it potentially destroyed in the Nebula. The purpose of the warning shot was to let Kirk know they would further engage if he kept running.
Obviously, it didn't work.
Primarily because there was no way that Kirk was going to give up his ship.
Pictures about "What's the meaning behind Khan's firing on the Enterprise as it approaches the Mutara Nebula?"
Is the Mutara Nebula real?
So how does the Mutara Nebula stack up? Mind you, this is a fictional nebula, so don't bother trying to find it on any star chart; it is not down on any map; true places never are. It doesn't actually exist.Which enterprise was in The Wrath of Khan?
The plot features Admiral James T. Kirk (William Shatner) and the crew of the starship USS Enterprise facing off against the genetically engineered tyrant Khan Noonien Singh (Ricardo Montalb\xe1n), a character who first appeared in the 1967 Star Trek episode "Space Seed".How did the enterprise defeat Khan?
Goaded into following Kirk, Khan pilots Reliant into the nebula, where shields and sensors are inoperable. Due to Khan's inexperience with three-dimensional space combat, Enterprise defeats Reliant and Khan is fatally wounded.How did Spock survive the wrath of Khan?
There, Spock's katra is reunited with his body in a dangerous procedure called fal-tor-pan. The ceremony is successful and Spock is resurrected, alive and well, though his memories are fragmented.what. (Bo Burnham FULL SHOW HD)
More answers regarding what's the meaning behind Khan's firing on the Enterprise as it approaches the Mutara Nebula?
Answer 2
About half way down this Web page from the Vonda McIntyre novelization,
... Khan decided to give him one last chance.
"Rake the Enterprise," he ordered.
The phaser rippled outward, a long finger of dense light. It streaked along the side of the Enterprise's starboard engine nacelle. The starship heeled over and began to tumble, spiraling on its headlong course.
The Enterprise lurched; its artificial gravity flexed, trembled, and finally steadied. ...
...
The ship shuddered again. ...
Reliant fired again. The Enterprise shuddered. If the shields were not quite steady, at least they held.
"Reliant is closing fast," Saavik said.
...
"They just don't want us going in there," Kirk said, nodding toward the viewscreen.
"One minute," Spock said.
Here, not only did Khan give a quite different command, but this text indicates that at least 3 shots were fired, with them either hitting or at least being close enough to have a significant effect.
Note the Wikipedia's movie's filming section says "Principal photography began on November 9, 1981, and ended on January 29, 1982". Since the novel was published in July, 1982, I suspect most, if not all, of it was written after the filming, and certainly after the movie script was created.
I don't know why the novel is different in this section. Several possibilities I can think of are that it's actually similar to an alternate version of that scene that was in the script but was not used in the released film, Vonda McIntyre decided their version was more plausible, and the book's handling works better in a printed format than the visual & audio format of the movie.
Regardless, for me, at least, what Khan said instead here (i.e., "Rake the Enterprise") and there being at least 3 shots fired, definitely intended to hit & damage the Enterprise, makes more realistic sense than what was in the movie. Thus, I suggest the most likely explanation for the movie scene is that it was just primarily for dramatic effect.
Answer 3
Reliant's shot was not meant to damage or alter Enterprise's course; there's nothing that implies it was a "shot across a bow" as you mentioned in your question.
The intention of the shot was merely a warning: you're within range of our weapons; if you keep moving your ship forward, the next shot will cause real damage.
Khan was counting on Kirk putting the safety of Enterprise (and its crew) above his ego.
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Enoch Patro, Designecologist, Pixabay, Peter Spencer