Are there differences in the ways/rationales that movies cast real persons to play "themselves?"

Are there differences in the ways/rationales that movies cast real persons to play "themselves?" - Man in Black Suit Jacket Standing in Front of People Sitting on Chairs

One situation is when the movie features a famous person, especially with a relatively small part. I have a recollection of (former Secretary of State) Henry Kissinger in such a role. This is what I call "historical" or "biographical" casting, in which people play a role in a movie that they played in "history," or at least in "society."

On the other hand, suppose there is a fairly minor movie character such as a waitress. Except that this "waitress" has a particular style that helps advance the plot. And suppose this style was more or less "unique" to this waitress, whom "someone" (read the screen writer) knew a decade ago. Would the casting director of a such a movie try to find the waitress to play herself (or perhaps a younger version) because she would be more "authentic?" Or would they be more likely to cast a professional actress in the role?

How is the decision made in these instances between the movie using or not using the original person?



Best Answer

Hiring someone to "play themselves" is a very specific thing.

For example, in Ocean's Twelve, Bruce Willis literally plays Bruce Willis. That's the character's name.

Similarly, news anchors often appear as themselves in films set in the real world... Larry King has done it many times.

This is different than what I think you're talking about... which is called, in the industry, Real People Casting. The decision to go this route is made by the director of the film, not the casting director, though the casting director may recommend it if the role/s warrants it. Generally, casting directors will cast all actors unless the character has very specific need that can't be filled by actors. Remember, the casting director only acts as a filter and a source of advice for casting. He/She doesn't generally make any casting decisions.

When you follow this method of casting, you avoid casting actors in the scripted roles and, instead, find people who actually resemble your characters to some specific degree... perhaps they do the work your character does, or they have dealt with the same things in their lives. The person is still playing a character. The character doesn't have their own name, for example, and the director is still often telling the person how to perform a scene to get the performance they want.

One of the people who I think is best known for using this method is Terrence Malick. Many of the characters in Tree of Life are real people cast because he liked the way they look or who they are and roles are often created for them.

For The Tree of Life, Malick sought out non-actors for most of the characters and gave very little direction (as is his way). In his view, the worst thing you can do is cast someone who is naturally perfect for a particular role and then tell him or her to be someone else.

The preliminary casting for the main character in the upcoming Mike White pilot for HBO, Mamma Dallas, a comedy show about a drag queen, included outreach to real drag queens, though they eventually cast an actor for that role.

Real people can also be cast for technical reasons, for example, hiring an actual nurse to play a nurse. In Parkland at least two of the nurses in the OR scenes are actual nurses. They're not credited as actors, though.

Some casting directors even specialize in this type of casting (Google search). Generally, for safety, you're going to see some actors in addition to the real people. There are natural actors out there but, particularly for something like a waitress, I'm sure many actors will attest to the fact that they've had that real experience themselves.

There's also a couple of other cases that may apply:

A role being based on a real person:

This is common in all forms of fictional writing and is not limited to scriptwriting. In this case, the role is generally based on someone the writer (or writer/director) uses someone they know as inspiration for a character. The role is often still filled by an actor, either because the real person isn't interested in playing the role or isn't alive (or an appropriate age) any more... or just isn't good at acting. Even if you're just telling a person to be themselves, it doesn't always come across well on camera. That doesn't mean you can't consider that person for the role (or use real people casting to find someone similar).

Also, when you're basing a character on a person, you're creating a character based on your interpretation of the outward characteristics and personality of that person... and they may not even be aware of what they're doing, so if you ask them to do what they usually do, it may end up being different than what you remember.

This is difficult to document without some insider knowledge as the screenwriter doesn't usually have any role in casting decisions unless they're also the director or producer of the project.

Role being written for a specific person:

I don't think this really applies but I figured I'd mention it. Some writers (more often writer/directors) will create a role with a particular person, usually an actor, in mind for that role. This isn't uncommon but even with famous directors, they don't always end up getting that person to fill the role.




Pictures about "Are there differences in the ways/rationales that movies cast real persons to play "themselves?""

Are there differences in the ways/rationales that movies cast real persons to play "themselves?" - Woman in White Long Sleeve Shirt Sitting on Red Chair
Are there differences in the ways/rationales that movies cast real persons to play "themselves?" - Man Sitting On A Chair With A Smile On His Face
Are there differences in the ways/rationales that movies cast real persons to play "themselves?" - Group Of People Sitting With Their Scripts



What is it when someone plays the same role in different ways?

In theatrical terms, double-casting is when two actors are both cast in the same role, and take turns playing the role during alternating performances. It is different than casting an understudy.

How do actors separate themselves from their roles?

Examples of de-roling techniques include shaking limbs and body to literally shake the character off, or ritualistically stepping out of a performance by handing back a character's specific prop or costume piece to a director.

How are plays different from movies?

Everyone in the audience needs to see the action and hear the dialogue on stage, so theatre actors must exaggerate their movements and speak loudly to bridge the gap. Films, on the other hand, use a camera to eliminate the distance between performer and observer.

What does it mean when an actor plays a character as themselves?

This trope is when a real-life celebrity or famous figure is playing a fictionalized version of themselves, as a main character or recurring character. This is mostly a television trope, but there are film examples.



Why Did Victorian Women Crush Themselves To Death? | Hidden Killers | Absolute History




Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: cottonbro, cottonbro, cottonbro, cottonbro