How did the plan work out at the end?

How did the plan work out at the end? - Top view of miniature airplane placed on over gray world map with crop hand of anonymous person indicating direction representing travel concept

In the end of Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children we see Jake going to his grandfather's house. And he is alive even when he was killed in the very beginning of the movie.

Why was Abraham "Abe" Portman, the grandparent of Jake Portman alive when they destroyed Mr. Barron?

Does it mean that everyone killed by Mr. Barron returned to life or just the ones who lived in Miss Peregrine's loop?



Best Answer

On Wikipedia's page for the movie plot it says:

Malthus' death erased himself and his murder of Abe from the future.

So you can chalk that one off as a bad writing / writers not understanding how time travel works / glossing over these details to make a happy ending.

If Abe doesn't get killed, Jake (in that timeline) will not travel to meet Miss Peregrine (he only goes to Wales after Dr. Golan helped him to convince his parents) therefore possibly not killing Malthus, breaking the whole time travel in the movie.




Pictures about "How did the plan work out at the end?"

How did the plan work out at the end? - From above of crop anonymous person driving toy airplane on empty world map drawn on blackboard representing travel concept
How did the plan work out at the end? - Crop unrecognizable female designer in warm sweater drawing with brown marker on large sheet of paper while working on pattern
How did the plan work out at the end? - Top view of crop anonymous person holding toy airplane on colorful world map drawn on chalkboard



What song does New Work Out Plan Sample?

"Work Out" by J. Cole samples the song.

Who does J Cole sample in Work Out?

The song, produced by Cole himself, samples "The New Workout Plan" by Kanye West and interpolates "Straight Up" by Paula Abdul. The song is featured as a bonus track on Cole World: The Sideline Story.



Kanye West - The New Workout Plan (Long Version)




More answers regarding how did the plan work out at the end?

Answer 2

The ending does not make sense. At least to me. Here is what Emma tells Jake while they're aboard the ship on the way to Blackpool (the location of Miss Avocet's January 2016 loop):

Jake, you know what this means don't you? ... We have to get to our own time but you don't. You can continue to live in 2016... If we kill Barron, he'll be gone but time will carry on. He won't go to Florida, Abe won't die, and you can go home."

At least to me, it doesn't make logical sense that killing Barron would save the life of Jake's grandfather Abe. Abe died in July 2016, so theoretically killing a version of Barron from before then would prevent Abe's death. But that's not what happens; in Blackpool Barron speaks about Abe's death:

I tracked Abe Portman for months. All I needed was a few minutes to get the location of Miss Peregrine's loop from him. But no, Mathus couldn't wait. And instead, I had to masquerade as a psychiatrist for three weeks in Florida.

So Barron has already participated in the Florida events. So it does not make logical sense that killing Barron will mean that "he won't go to Florida [and] Abe won't die".

The movie logic seems to be something like "If you die in a loop then both your past and your future are completely erased from the timeline." I think that's the meaning of the statement "he'll be gone but time will carry on". But it seems impossible to come up with a model of time travel where that would make sense.

Answer 3

No, time was linear for the main characters. Baron's associate, the hollowgast, killed Abe, which led Jake to the island, which allowed Baron to locate the loop, which led to the chase and the London loop. The London loop was 6 months in the past, which is what allowed Jake to visit his grandparent. Only visit, not save. See https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/142842/how-did-this-character-survive/142878 for additional comments.

Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Andrea Piacquadio, Andrea Piacquadio, Karolina Grabowska, Andrea Piacquadio