What was the original ending and why was it changed?

What was the original ending and why was it changed? - Pink and White I M a Little Print Textile

The movie

The Butterfly Effect (2004) has multiple and very different endings. Specifically there appears to be two factors on the main character's decision:

  • Save his girlfriend's life
  • Save his girlfriend's life and mother's life.

I found it weird that the first ending would not compromise the other (it's like a happy ending where the viewer doesn't know what happened to his mother or to the main character's "gift")

After checking on the web and discussing with others I am not sure which was the original intended ending.

Is it reported anywhere why the need to dramatically change the ending?



Best Answer

There are 4 different endings:

Theatrical Ending:

Evan travels back to the birthday party where he first meets Kayleigh and whispers to her "I hate you and if you ever come near me again I'll kill you and your whole damn family." Kayleigh runs away crying.

  12

After a montage of his memories disintegrating, Evan returns to present day in the dorm room with Lenny, and the two of them burn all of Evan's journals.

Eight years pass. One day, Evan and Kayleigh (Amy Smart) are walking down a street, going in opposite directions. When they pass each other, they seem to recognize each other for a second but keep walking away.

  3


Alternate Ending 1:

Same as Theatrical Ending, only Evan turns and follows Kayleigh.

  a1a1b


Alternate Ending 2:

Same as Alternate Ending 1 only Evan and Kayleigh talk to each other.

  a2a2b


Director's Cut:

At the end, while Evan has barricaded himself in the office, he starts playing a home movie his father made just as his mother was giving birth to him. Evan travels back into his mother's womb and strangles himself with the umbilical cord.

  dc1dc2

Said to be the original ending but, because it did poorly with the screening audience, the theatrical ending was chosen for cinema release.

The Director's Cut has quite a few more additional scenes.




Pictures about "What was the original ending and why was it changed?"

What was the original ending and why was it changed? - Pink and White Love Print Textile
What was the original ending and why was it changed? - Creative artwork with Frida Kahlo painting decorated with colorful floral headband on graffiti wall
What was the original ending and why was it changed? - Black and white glad children in casual clothes standing on authentic town street and looking at camera with curiosity



How did aot originally end?

This timeline ends as the Attack on Titan manga ends; Eren is implied to be reincarnated via a bird, and while his friends live their lives, Paradis is eventually destroyed. Going back to the first timeline, fans may also remember a similarly-designed white bird flying above Eren and Mikasa.

Why was the Get Out ending changed?

The country was different. We weren't in the Obama era, we were in this new world where all the racism crept out from under the rocks again. It was always an ending that we debated back and forth, so we decided to go back and shoot the pieces for the other ending where Chris wins."

Why did they change the ending to the butterfly effect?

Evan travels back into his mother's womb and strangles himself with the umbilical cord. Said to be the original ending but, because it did poorly with the screening audience, the theatrical ending was chosen for cinema release.

What is the original ending of the butterfly effect?

Originally, Evan prevents a friendship from occurring At the end of the film, Evan realizes that he is hurting his friends more than he is helping them. So, he decides to remove himself from their lives. He travels back to his childhood one last time to the moment he first met one of his friends, Kayleigh.



Reva's ORIGINAL Death Revealed...Why did Lucasfilm Change This




More answers regarding what was the original ending and why was it changed?

Answer 2

I don't quite get what you meant by,

I found it weird that the first ending would not compromise the other (it's like a happy ending where the viewer doesn't know what happened to his mother or to the main character's "gift")

Anyway, the way I understood is this:

The original ending was the ending which Evan was in a psychiatric hospital- he is in a really depressed state as he is fully aware that it is he who killed his girlfriend, Kayleigh. What the doctor said was true- Evan was making alternate realities in his mind to escape his guilt about killing her (he throwed the dynamite at her father, but it landed beneath her).

But then he steals the earliest home-movie tape in which he had met Kayleigh for the the first time in his life (the real one)- at a party. He then "travels" into the scene (for real) and then blames Kayleigh (says he hates her, etc, etc.), thus avoiding ever meeting her and playing with her- and the dynamite scene and child abuse (by her father) would never have happened in the first place. And consequently, Evan would not be crazy, his other friends would be good in life, and he would have led a normal college life.

This is not based on real facts, but is the way I interpreted the movie and understood it.

Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Ann H, Ann H, Brett Sayles, Julia Volk