Why did Colonel Mortimer's sister kill herself instead of killing Indio?
For a Few Dollars More is considered one of Sergio Leone's finest works and is without a doubt one of my favorite movies. But every time I watch it, something feels a little off.
In a flashback scene we see the movie's main villain Indio murder the lover of Colonel Mortimer's sister before proceeding to rape her.
However, Indio was not careful and left his gun within arm's reach of the girl. While still being assaulted, she seizes it and then shoots herself with the weapon.
I can understand that after losing the love of her life and enduring the horror of rape, one might want to commit suicide.
What I don't get, however, is why she didn't shoot Indio beforehand, thus putting an end to the rape and avenging her lover in the process.
Is there any explanation as to why she acted the way she did?
I don't mind that much, since this event was the basis of Mortimer's revenge-filled quest that gave us such an awesome movie, but I can't help but wonder every time I see this scene.
Best Answer
Colonel Mortimer's sister is a good person
She has just witnessed her lover (or in the novel her new husband) gunned down, and been raped.
Her world is devastated, however she is a Christian (we see her crucifix and see the Colonel Bible when we first see him). She is not a murderer, even in revenge for such crimes.
She decides she cannot take any more so kills herself, but the thought of killing Indeo never crosses her mind.
Mortimer being a soldier however feels no restraint in claiming revenge in this way.
Pictures about "Why did Colonel Mortimer's sister kill herself instead of killing Indio?"
LEE VAN CLEEF is Colonel DOUGLAS MORTIMER
More answers regarding why did Colonel Mortimer's sister kill herself instead of killing Indio?
Answer 2
In For a few Dollars More, El Indio is the villain, pursued by Manco and Mortimer. The attack on Mortimer's sister is revealed in flashbacks, so that event happened earlier than the events in the main timeline of the movie. If Mortimer's sister had killed him, there would be no villain, and thus no story and no movie. So it really boils down to a narrative decision.
Also, the film was made in 1965. While female characters in movies of the time were capable of committing violence, it was more likely that they would be victims. Mortimer's sister can be seen as an example of the Disposable Woman trope, a female character whose death gives the hero a reason for revenge. There are also elements of the Lost Lenore and Heroic Sacrifice tropes. But again, it boils down to a narrative, plot choice made by the storyteller. Even if it would make more sense for her to have shot El Indio herself, the storyteller needed him alive and her dead to tell the story he wanted to tell.
Answer 3
Thou shalt not kill.
There's a crucifix hanging in her bedroom. Suicide is debatably a sin. Murder is not up for debate. And unless you're psychotic, it's not as easy as the movies make it out to be.
When you hang a man you'd better look at him.
Answer 4
It would be speculation only on my part but besides narrative decision if you must give justification to her action it could be that she inflicted more pain on him by killing herself rather than shooting him. however the average 19 century person probably would not know enough about psychology and the long term effects to have it be a conscious decision,
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Vijay Putra, Vlada Karpovich, Brett Sayles, Vlada Karpovich