Why did Strange and Norrell use "nameless slave" to summon The Raven King?

Why did Strange and Norrell use "nameless slave" to summon The Raven King? - Man in Brown Jacket and Black Pants Holding Red and White Stick

In the final episode of the TV show adaptation of Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell, Strange and Norrell succeed in summoning The Raven King by naming him simply "The King". Uskglass appears for a split second then vanishes.

Then they decide to summon him again. But instead of using the same name as before, which was proven to work, they decide to use "the nameless slave" which Norrell points out is "extremely imprecise".

My question is: Why didn't they use the same name as before?



Best Answer

There's no name which can be guaranteed to identify the Raven King.

There are many names by which he might be called, but none of his known names are unique to him. They used the moniker "the nameless slave" perhaps because they thought it would be unique to him - or at least more likely to be so than "the King", which could as easily have summoned the King of England - because they didn't know about Stephen Black and his destiny.

This is covered in more detail in the source novel:

Mr Norrell sighed. "It is not like summoning any one else. There are difficulties peculiar to any magic involving John Uskglass."

"Such as?"

"Well, for one thing we do not know what to call him. Spells of summoning require the magician to be most particular about names. None of the names by which we call John Uskglass were really his own. He was, as the histories tell, stolen away into Faerie, before he could be christened – and so he became the nameless child in the brugh. `The nameless slave' was one of the ways in which he referred to himself. Of course the fairies gave him a name after their own fashion, but he cast that off when he returned to England. As for all his titles – the Raven King, the Black King, the King of the North – these are what other people called him, not what he called himself."

"Yes, yes!" declared Strange, impatiently. "I know all that! But surely John Uskglass was his true name?"

"Oh! By no means. That was the name of a young Norman aristocrat who died, I believe, in the summer of 1097. The King – our John Uskglass – claimed that man as his father, but many people have disputed whether they were really related at all. I do not suppose that this muddle of names and titles is accidental. The King knew that he would always draw the eyes of other magicians to him and so he protected himself from the nuisance of their magic by deliberately confusing their spells."

-- Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, p.957

When he comes to Yorkshire to rewrite his book on Vinculus, they manage to identify his location using "John Uskglass":

Cheerfully he reminded Strange that they still had not found a way to name John Uskglass and that this was certain to be a great obstacle in finding him – by magic or any other means.

Strange, with his head propped up on his hands, stared at him gloomily. "Just try John Uskglass," he said.

So Norrell did the magic, naming John Uskglass as the person they sought. He divided the surface of the water into quarters with lines of glittering light. He gave each quarter a name: Heaven, Hell, Earth and Faerie. Instantly a speck of bluish light shone in the quarter that represented Earth.

"There!" said Strange, leaping up triumphantly. "You see, sir! Things are not always as difficult as you suppose."

-- Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, p.964-66

But after he goes back to his fairy realm, they have trouble locating him under any name except "the nameless slave" (which, of course, refers to Stephen instead):

At Hurtfew the two magicians had found The Language of Birds – it lay open on the table at the page where the fairy spell was printed. But the problem of finding a name for John Uskglass remained. Norrell sat crouched over the silver dish of water doing location spells. They had already run through all the titles and names they could think of, and the location spell did not recognize a single one. The water in the silver dish remained dark and featureless.

"What of his fairy name?" said Strange.

"That is lost," replied Norrell.

"Did we try the King of the North yet?"

"Yes."

"Oh." Strange thought for a moment and then said, "What was that curious appellation you mentioned before? Something you said he called himself? The nameless something?"

"The nameless slave?"

"Yes. Try that."

Norrell looked very doubtful. But he cast the spell for the nameless slave. Instantly a speck of bluish light appeared. He proceeded and the nameless slave proved to be in Yorkshire – in very much the same place where John Uskglass had appeared before.

"There!" exclaimed Strange, triumphantly. "All our anxiety was quite needless. He is still here."

"But I do not think that is the same person," interrupted Norrell. "It looks different somehow."

"Mr Norrell, do not be fanciful, I beg you! Who else could it be? How many nameless slaves can there possibly be in Yorkshire?"

This was so very reasonable a question that Mr Norrell offered no further objections.

"And now for the magic itself," said Strange.

-- Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, p.980

Note those last few lines: Norrell senses intuitively that they've got the wrong man, but the argument that "the nameless slave" surely cannot refer to anyone else is enough to convince him.




Pictures about "Why did Strange and Norrell use "nameless slave" to summon The Raven King?"

Why did Strange and Norrell use "nameless slave" to summon The Raven King? - Person Holding Silver Iphone 6
Why did Strange and Norrell use "nameless slave" to summon The Raven King? -  Iphone 6 on Gray Textile
Why did Strange and Norrell use "nameless slave" to summon The Raven King? - Person Holding Iphone 6 With Inspirational Quote On Display



Is Vinculus the Raven King?

The Raven King's sudden involvement changes the entire point of the novel. As I already proved in detail while answering another question, the man who appears in Chapter 67 to revive Vinculus is John Uskglass, the Raven King, who's been so much talked about and yet does so little when he finally shows up.

Who is the Raven King in Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell?

All magic was absorbed into Stephen Black, after Norrell and Strange specified \u201cthe nameless slave\u201d, a moniker more relevant to Stephen than John Uskglass, the Raven King himself. So it was that Stephen fittingly exacted his revenge upon the Gentleman for his tyranny, sealing him in the roots of a tree.

What is the Raven King?

The Raven King is the fourth and final book in The Raven Cycle by author Maggie Stiefvater.

What is the prophecy in Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell?

The first shall bury his heart in the dark wood beneath the snow, yet still feel its ache. The second shall see his dearest possession in his enemy's hand. Both will fail.




Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: cottonbro, Castorly Stock, Castorly Stock, Castorly Stock