Why didn't Richard Kimble get shot?
Who doesn't love The Fugitive? Seriously there is just one part of the movie I don't get. This is after Kimble leaves visiting the prisoner at the city jail and is being chased by Deputy Gerard.
Tommy Lee Jones' character is supposed to be a bad ass and saved one of his crew earlier in the movie with a tricky shot. And then when he is shooting at Kimble as the bullet proof gates close we see the marks on the gates right at the heart and head of Kimble. But what the f&!$? First would his character open fire in a public place like that on an unarmed man running?
And most importantly we know he has a bad-ass shot. So he isn't allowed to shoot Kimble's foot or leg with the gate open a good 6-10 inches? Then to follow this up it seems someone (maybe even Gerard himself) should bring up that he could have shot him. Shoot his damn foot or at least try and miss.
Best Answer
It's quite clear from the script that Gerard was aiming to kill...he's stunned to find out that Kimble isn't dead....he wasn't aware that it was bullet-proof glass.
Gerard FIRES seven times in two seconds. Kimble goes down. SHOTS and SCREAMS ECHO around the lobby. A long beat, then Gerard rises. THROUGH GLASS studded with bullet holes, he sees... Kimble rising... staring back. Equally astounded that he's alive. He runs free. GERARD Open the doors! Gerard pounds against the doors. Sees cratering in the glass - and then sees flattened slugs all over the floor. It's bullet-proof glass. THROUGH the glass he sees Kimble rush across the street and disappear into the parade.
Pictures about "Why didn't Richard Kimble get shot?"
How long was Richard Kimble on the run in The Fugitive?
The series premise was set up in the opening narration, but the full details about the crime were not offered in the pilot episode; at the time of the pilot, Kimble has been on the run for six months, having exhausted all of his appeals against his death sentence.What happens to Copeland in The Fugitive?
Davis does a good job in establishing Copeland as a bad person. The prison bus escape was brutal and he violently attempts to hold a Marshall hostage in a desperate and ultimately worthless bid to stay on the run. Copeland is fatally shot by Gerard who plainly states what we've just witnessed, \u201cI.What does the landlady say in The Fugitive?
Helen Kimble's 911 call is treated as the most damning piece of evidence against Richard, yet it starts with her saying "There's someone in my house" (i.e. a stranger). If Richard was her attacker, she would not have referred to him as "someone".What happens at the end of the movie The Fugitive?
\u201cThe Judgment\u201d ends with the One-Armed Man dead, and Kimble exonerated, embarking on a new life with Jean. A happy ending? Not quite. A police car pulls up beside him, and Kimble visibly flinches, indicating that he will probably be looking over his shoulder for years to come.Why Didn't You Stop Me?
More answers regarding why didn't Richard Kimble get shot?
Answer 2
I disagree with the idea that he was intentionally missing. It is certainly NOT a plot device showing some intention by Gerard to let Kimble know he is off the hook.
- This is preposterous! You don't communicate with people by shooting at them!
- Even if you know for a certain that you are shooting at bulletproof glass (and we don't know if Gerard was on the security architecture team of the building), you simply can't reasonably RELY on it stopping the bullets.
The answer is simple: He was executing a shooting routine under stress. This is how expert shooters train to engage targets. He didn't shoot the foot because he doesn't have a foot shooting routine. Shooting the foot would require a non-routine aimed shot, which is several times more difficult than a shot executed from muscle memory.
Answer 3
You're right to bring up the other scene where we see he's a "bad ass shot", as we see he doesn't hesitate to shoot to hurt/kill. Why not with Kimble? In fact why the hostage scene (or even the other escaped convinct character!) in the first place? It doesn't add anything to the story does it? Unless...
By the time the city jail scene comes along, there is enough for Gerard to start having doubts about Kimble's guilt. The other marshals have started asking the question "why would he be going after the one armed man"? Gerard is relentless and professional, but he isn't stupid, he must suspect that Kimble is innocent.
During the scene - which for me is pivotal - if you notice, Gerard shoots a few times first, Kimble hits the ground and looks back. The camera switches to Gerard, who aims for the head (knowing that the glass is bullet proof by this time) and shoots again bang on target. The next shot clearly show's Kimble's foot stuck, and vurnerable. A nice big target. And unharmed.
My opinion is Gerard took the shot to the head instead of the foot to say something like "Look at what a good shot I am, I could have disabled you like I killed the other guy, but I'm giving you a chance. Now run and try and prove your innocence."
Answer 4
Shooting to maim is illegal. So is shooting anyone that is not currently endangering anyone else. Authorization to use deadly force without prejudice was unlikely: he's a US marshal; not a bounty hunter.
Answer 5
I want it to be that Gérard was giving him a chance to escape. However due to his eagerness to get through the door and continue the chase, Gérard was shooting to kill. Given the doubts already established to kimbles guilt, this is a mistake in the movie, taking away from the respect Kimble earns in Gerards eyes at the end. Its a missed opportunity in the film to increase the bond between them
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: cottonbro, Nicole Michalou, cottonbro, Tatiana Syrikova