Why is Alex Kirkman disappointed in Tom Kirkman for what happened to the Syrian refugees?
In Designated Survivor (2016 - present), President Tom Kirkman makes a deal with the governors to receive support from them in exchange for refusing a plane of refugees from Syria who instead are going to Canada. His wife Alex Kirkman is disappointed in him. Why is that so? Below is the transcript of the conversation (emphasis added):
So, I just got off the phone with Governor Baylin of Missouri. He says the plane can land in Jefferson City and that he will accept all of the refugees, even if Florida won't. What is it?
It's too late. The plane left 10 minutes ago for Toronto. The mother, the father, the baby can stay. Everybody else had to go.
Well, who says?
The governors. Me. I had to make a deal to keep the rest of the governors on board.
Wh... I thought we were on the same page.
We were. We... We are. Look, they threatened to withhold Congress over this. I had to give them something.
Tom, those people gave up everything to come here. This country made them a promise.
Alex, they're going to Canada, not back to Syria. They'll still be free. They'll still be safe.
Yeah, but they could be free and safe here. Governor Baylin is ready for them.
Well, unfortunately, he's not in the majority.
No, he was standing up for an American principle. Who are we without our principles?
Alex, it was an impossible choice. I know, and you had to make it and you will again, a-and the choices will always be impossible. That's not gonna change. But y-you will, and I will, and... this will. It used to be you and me against the world.
I have an obligation to the country. I took the job!
I'm not angry with the president. I am disappointed in my husband.
I'm not quite sure I understand on what's going. As Tom pointed out, it's not like the refugees are going back to Syria: they're going to Canada. I would understand Alex's disappointment if it was governors vs sending refugees back. Please explain the disappointment. Also, what principle?
The answer may involve some background with politics or the US of which I am unaware in which case please enlighten me (I actually don't know much of the background in Homeland (2011 - present)). Or it may be that there is no in-universe explanation (i.e. bad writing?) and that the aforementioned scene was just for drama (hence the tag).
Best Answer
Because he caved
His original principles were in alignment with his wife's.
The refugees were promised asylum in the US and that's not what happened.
The refugees could, and should, have been granted asylum/refuge in the United States without reservations.
Instead, he made a deal with the Senators/Congress to divert them to Canada due to political pressure.
Granted they are still "safe" but he's given in and been involved in a deal for political reasons rather than staying true to his humanitarian beliefs / principles.
It's not a question of degree of safety. You make a promise, you stick to it....and he didn't.
Pictures about "Why is Alex Kirkman disappointed in Tom Kirkman for what happened to the Syrian refugees?"
Does Tom Kirkman stay president?
At the end of election day, Tom Kirkman finds himself re-elected as president after a fairly dirty campaign.Why did they make Tom Kirkman designated survivor?
Kirkman was named the Designated Survivor for President Richmond's State of the Union speech when the Capitol was bombed by terrorists, largely destroying the building. The bombing resulted in the deaths of Richmond, all the other members of the Cabinet, and nearly all of Congress.What happens to Alex Kirkman in designated survivor?
Alex Kirkman's death explained. After episode 1 of the latest season aired, it became apparent that Alex's character was killed off in an abrupt car accident. It wasn't clearly stated at the end of Season 2, but Season 3 pretty much confirmed that she wasn't going to come back.Is Alex Kirkman Russian?
Alex was born to a Russian mother.Why more Syrian refugees are leaving Jordan than arriving
More answers regarding why is Alex Kirkman disappointed in Tom Kirkman for what happened to the Syrian refugees?
Answer 2
There is a major problem in that the Governors in fact have no standing to make the President do anything in this regard...the people who could do that would be the Senators who the Governors are portrayed as refusing to appoint as a bargaining chip.Completely unrealistic writing,they would have been RACING each other to get their people into the Senate to validly hold Kirkman's feet to the fire,they can't do that themselves.
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Yan Krukov, Moose Photos, Vera Arsic, Andrea Piacquadio