Why was Michael Scott forgotten so easily?

Why was Michael Scott forgotten so easily? - Shabby wooden house with grass covered roof in snowy terrain with forgotten village

Michael Scott, a Dunder Mifflin employee for 19 years and was with these employees for more than 10 years. (correct me if I am wrong) But as he left the office suddenly to move to Colorado, he was instantly forgotten too. The office just moves on with new boss and later new CEO and never have another Michael Scott moment again.

One would think that Michael Scott had so much influence on these people's lives and he was so so much involved in their lives (despite their annoyance at times) the office would not forget him so easily. He would be remembered, mentioned often. One employee would randomly mention he talked to Michael or an update on Michael's life is shared. Strangely none of that happened until the very last episode.

In the last episode, it is mentioned he is married and has four kids. Quite strange actually, as no one was invited to his wedding and not a single employee knew he is married and has kids. not even his confidant Dwight, his Best friends Jim and Ryan or his favorite female friend Pam.

What could be the reason for this? was the office so annoyed by him that everyone was just happy he left and never cared about him ever again?



Best Answer

Keep in mind that we do not see a full working day.

Assuming that we see the episode's 20 minutes runtime as uninterrupted work time footage (with no concurrent scenes shown one after the other), that's still only 4.2% of a work day. We're not seeing 95.8% of a work day.
And this is assuming that we could keep an eye on every character at the same time. Since we realistically can't (unless they're all grouped together, which is not the case for the majority of time), this further lowers the amount of footage we actually get to see from a given work day.

Reminiscing about Michael is either relevant to the plot, or it is not relevant to the plot. If it is not relevant to the plot, then there's no need to display it as it is a waste of screen time.

Reminiscing about Michael can only be relevant to the plot in cases where Steve Carell doesn't need to appear anymore. E.g. if Dwight went through an emo phase due to missing Michael, it would've been relevant to reminisce about Michael for Dwight's storyline.

However, since there were no (sub)plots involving characters dealing with Michael's absence; there was no reason to bring up Michael's absence again.




Pictures about "Why was Michael Scott forgotten so easily?"

Why was Michael Scott forgotten so easily? - Gray and Black Wooden Wall
Why was Michael Scott forgotten so easily? - Old wooden barns on green hill
Why was Michael Scott forgotten so easily? - Remaining walls of ruined abandoned building



Was Michael Scott actually a good salesman?

Despite all of Michael Scott's faults, and he has many, he actually is a pretty great salesman. Michael's sales abilities are shown multiple times during the show. The show also usually shines a light on how bad Ryan or Andy are in comparison.

Did The Office ratings drop after Michael left?

Michael Scott is sorely missed. Ratings for NBC's The Office were significantly down in the first week following Steve Carell's last episode. Thursday night's episode had 6.8 million viewers and a 3.5 preliminary adults 18-49 rating. The rating for the adult demo fell 17 percent after spiking last week.

Why was Michael not at the panel?

Steve Carell didn't want to play a big part in the finale Michael Scott's story was over, but having him return for Dwight and Angela's wedding was the perfect way to bring him back for the Office family reunion.

Why do people love Michael Scott so much?

He Loved His Employees Michael Scott would have sacrified everything for his employees. Michael Scott's employees were more like family to him, and the office was more like his home. He wasn't afraid to admit that, either. He straight-up said it.



Why The Office Changed The Original Michael Scott




Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Matheus Bertelli, cottonbro, eberhard grossgasteiger, Matthias Groeneveld