Does the cats' anthropomorphization have any implications for our human reality?

Does the cats' anthropomorphization have any implications for our human reality? - Person Holding White and Black Cat

The world of Felidae presents us with cats that seem only mildly anthropomorphized, in a psychological way rather than physiologically. They are more or less as intelligent as average humans, self aware and aware of the human world and its customs, speak to each other, read and -- albeit only in the rather exceptional case of Pascal -- can learn to use a computer.

But in their physiology (except for a little artistic freedom of the animation) and behaviours they still seem to be bound to their existence as cats, they look like cats, walk like cats, eat like cats, fight like cats, and f--k like cats. Add to this that other animals like rats and crows don't seem to be anthropomorphized at all. So while the increased intelligence and the reading ability might be unusual, this doesn't so far seem to interfere with our observed reality that much, only enhance it with a "look behind the scenes" of the cats' world which might as well be understood as largely metaphorical.

But there is one significant moment where this interpretation gets shattered from the ground and an actual deviation from our reality is indeed suggested, but there isn't made much more out of this in the further course of the story. During Francis' examination of Dr. Preterius' video journal the doctor at one point raves that Claudandus has started to speak to him:

Yes Claudandus, talk to me, he he, fascinating idea. The animal has no sense of humour. What did he say, that I should release him from his cage, and face him, in hand to hand combat? What's this, I've got to save Claudandus?

Though, at this point the good doctor is already on his best way to insanity, not to speak of his drinking problems, so it might as well be a hallucination. Yet, when Francis later confronts Pascal (now revealed to be Claudandus) he says that he indeed spoke with Preterius, much to Francis' surprise:

Pascal: Yes, I'm Claudandus, you're right. I was in the laboratory and I did survive Preterius' unspeakable tortures. And when he eventually went mad I spoke to him!
Francis: You spoke to a man?!
Pascal: He was fascinated, he let me out of my cage.

But this isn't touched upon further and I'm not sure what to make out of this and what it's actual implications for the depicted reality are. Does that actually present a deviation from our observed reality? Does that mean the cats are generally able to speak to humans but refrain from doing so? Or is Pascal a special case (maybe in relation to the experiments Preterius conducted and him being the only one on which his tissue glue worked)? Or was this only facilitated by Preterius' advanced insanity? Or does Pascal himself overinterpret the events and it was really only a hallucination by Preterius? Or is this an utter surprise and mysterious event in the cat world, too? I see that this might not be entirely answerable by the movie alone and it might be that only the novel can present any further insights here, if the movie was true to it in this regard at all. Or was this not elaborated further anywhere?



Best Answer

Good question, made me check my copy of the original German novel. It actually does provide some further insight and supports a combination of your first two guesses: cats cannot easily talk to people and there is a religious taboo against it. If Pascal speaks the truth, he found it hard but there is no indication that he needed anything but determination, effort and some time to succeed. This is my translation:

"You talked to him? But that is sacrilege! We must not talk to the humans. The untouchables must not exchange a single word with the unclean, even when they are in mortal danger."

"Oh, look, there is a believer among us! But even if that should hurt your religious feelings, Francis, I have to say it: I hate God! I hate the one who created the world, I hate the one who created this mankind, men like Preterius and situations like back then. If there is a god, then he is a giant, horrid spider in the darkness. We cannot recognize the darkness, the spider's face behind it and the giant spider's net that is behind the illusion of happiness and kindliness."

"And how did to talk to him?"

"How? Well, I noticed that things were slowly but surely coming to an end for me and therefore didn't want to leave anything untried. So I made an effort and moved my jaw like a human, produced sounds like a human, imitated human speech. What croaked out of my throat sounded rather strange, but the madman understood it."

The fascinating religious angle is unfortunately not further explained. Maybe in some of the 7 sequels the author wrote. I have three of them, but it's been years since I read them. All I remember is that their plots tended to be pretty similar to the first one without being directly connected through anything other than the main character.




Pictures about "Does the cats' anthropomorphization have any implications for our human reality?"

Does the cats' anthropomorphization have any implications for our human reality? - Woman Beside Cups of Coffee
Does the cats' anthropomorphization have any implications for our human reality? - 3 Women Smiling and Standing Beside Table
Does the cats' anthropomorphization have any implications for our human reality? - People Gathering on Beach





Why Humans Are Obsessed with Cats | Annals of Obsession | The New Yorker




Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Arina Krasnikova, ANTONI SHKRABA production, Kampus Production, Ron Lach