Why didn't Germans simply set Fury on fire?
While watching Fury the other night, aside from stunning visuals and great acting I've noticed something rather peculiar. Considering Fury depicts the end of war by which time Germans should've seen enough and developed tons of fighting experience, why didn't they simply set the tank on fire? This would seem like the easiest and most intuitive solution to me.
Best Answer
Because it is an unrealistic movie scene.
Yes, the Germans were extremely good in taking out tanks with improvised means. And a lone tank needs movement to be effective against infantry, else it is dogmeat. There was one incredible situation where Audie Murphy (read the Wikipedia entry) did such a stunt by standing in a burning tank destroyer and using a 0.5 gun to mow down everything the Germans sent against him, but he was really in completely different weight class as soldier.
Otherwise, the Germans would simply encircle the tank and destroy it with
- Molotov cocktails. They work best if they burn on the top and they will suffocate/smoke out the engine/crew. This is the reason tanks need movement and/or protection from other tanks to make a small target and if hit, present the least vulnerable sides.
- Throw a handgrenade into the cannon pipe.
- Use a flamethrower against the openings.
- Bind several handgrenades together to form a bundled charge and place it under the tank bottom to use it as improvised tank mine.
The movie is simply said highly unrealistic.
Pictures about "Why didn't Germans simply set Fury on fire?"
Why did German let Norman live in Fury?
The reason the young German Waffen-SS Trooper did not turn him in is because like you said, he was young. He was basically in the same situation as Norman. Except Norman came around towards the end after his girlfriend got killed.Is Fury historically accurate?
While the storyline is fictional, the depiction of Fury and its commander Wardaddy parallels the experience of several real Allied tankers, such as the American tank commander Staff Sergeant Lafayette G.What does Brad Pitt say in German at the end of Fury?
This roundtable questions how film shapes or continues American ideals or mythos about World War II. For example, in Fury, the character Wardaddy (Brad Pitt) yells, \u201cShut up and send me more pigs to kill!\u201d in reference to the Germans.Was Fury a true story?
From Street Kings writer/director David Ayer, Fury is based on a collection of true stories from real-life army veterans who spent their time during World War II in tanks, just like Pitt's tank crew in the film.Why Didn't You Stop Me?
More answers regarding why didn't Germans simply set Fury on fire?
Answer 2
I am not completely sure, but I think that a reaction to the success of Molotov cocktails in the Finnish-Sovjet war was to change the design of air intake and exhaust to point downwards, so that burning petrol would not run into the engine. So in 1944 it was more difficult to set a tank on fire then in 1940.
However, once you get really close to a tank with broken tracks, you will find a way to destroy it. The British home guard was trained in doing so, the Germans in Fury probably only learned that to destroy a tank you shoot it with a panzerfaust. In the film we see that the troop is low on anti-tank grenades, and when they use it, they miss. So it is reasonable to assume that the Germans are highly motivated but poorly trained Volkssturm, who try to solve a problem by beating there head against a wall.
Answer 3
if you set a tank on fire from the outside, it wont burn. the only real way to set a tank on fire is to puncture its fuel tank and light it(this usually happens when a cannon round or an anti tank rocket round strikes the rear any where the fuel tanks are. a grenade with enough force can achieve this (german bk 2h))
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Anete Lusina, Anete Lusina, Ryutaro Tsukata, Maria Orlova