Why does Dr. Banks not know about having called the General? [duplicate]
Why does Dr. Banks in the future seem surprised on hearing that she had called the Chinese General in Arrival (2016)?
There are two ways she can perceive the future:
As an active observer: Her present consciousness is transported to her future body. This doesn't make sense because if this were the case, every time she experiences a vision about her daughter, she would act confused about where she was and maybe even ask the girl who she was. Instead, she acts as if she's known the girl all her life and converses easily with her.
A passive observer: This would make perfect sense in the movie if not for the General scene. She has no control over what her future self says or does. She simply experiences what her future self is. If this is the correct theory, she would act confidently, maybe even smile and ask the Chinese General for his phone number and wife's death words so her past self can dial him. Not be surprised and shocked.
So what is the correct theory? The final result seems like a mash of the two theories.
Pictures about "Why does Dr. Banks not know about having called the General? [duplicate]"
What did Dr Louise say to General Shang?
Louise tells Shang that his wife spoke to her in a dream and told her that \u201cwar doesn't make winners, only widows.\u201d Ian tells her that she can't stop what's happening. She responds by telling him that she just did. Word starts to come in over the comm lines that China is standing down.Tom Hanks Re-Enacts Iconic Forrest Gump Scene - The Graham Norton Show
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Ketut Subiyanto, Expect Best, SHVETS production, cottonbro